CMS 10th Anniversary

Happy Birthday, CMS! Today is a celebration of the ten years of the Comparative Media Studies program at MIT, which I am very proud to have a bachelor of science in. http://cms.mit.edu/anniversary/

Last night began with an address from Henry Jenkins about his 20 years at MIT, given almost a year after he left for USC. I need to listen to it again to respond to it, it was too much and too emotional for me at the time. You can listen to it here: http://cot.ag/cnmfBX (CMS has started getting podcasts up so fast! Yay, CMS!) Sam Ford has already written about last night's talk here: http://bit.ly/aF0yQA

First panel today is "Applied Humanities: Transforming Humanities Education", which I don't really feel like liveblogging. I may or may not do some liveblogging or livetweeting of the rest of the panels today. I expect to be updating this post.

One quote for now: "When you say you do educational games, it's like saying you're the blind date with a nice personality" - Scot Osterweil

3: Participatory Culture: The Culture of Democracy and Education in a Hypermediated Society, moderated by Henry Jenkins
Panelists: Erin Reilly, Karen Schrier, Sangita Shresthova, Pilar Lacasa, and Mitch Resnick

It's nice to see a majority female panel. In my own MIT experience, CMS always had the best representation of women at a graduate+ level. MIT has many undergraduate women, but grad students, less so.

"this is the first thing I learned at MIT: theory is not valuable without practice" -Pilar.

Sangita came to MIT as a dancer and other things but not a gamer, and was put on the games to teach project, and now she's at USC with Henry again. She's glad to work with Henry a second time because CMS took awhile to digest. Was a person between worlds, dancing and development, Czech-Nepali. Worked on how undergrads at MIT used Bollywood dance to express diaspora identity, MIT CMS responsible for direction her dissertation went.

(discussing play as one of the new media literacy skills) Karen: Play with other people's values, other people's ethics, break down boundaries, play is powerful because it lets you be yourself or be someone else and reflect on the values that you have.

Mitch: Play as a stance towards the world, play is not just games. went to a conference with theme of play, they showed all these video games, last day he played hookey to go see the anne frank house, realized that anne frank in his mind had a very playful stance towards the world, experimenting, exploring, trying out new things, that's what play is about, links closely to issues around participatory culture.

Erin: Anne frank made a choice to deal with her environment in a different way. [I get very distracted and mindblank on some of what Erin says, because she starts talking about how popular one activity I wrote for New Media Literacies about play was. I'll have to listen to the podcast to remember what came right before and after that. http://newmedialiteracies.org/library/ "Fail and Fail Often", link is on the front page currently]

Remix:

Erin: James Gee and situated learning, DJs as hunters and gatherers of samples, teachers need to realize that they are also hunters and gatherers, providing people a vocabulary to identify themselves.

Mitch: Incomprehensible that we have this whole educational structure opposed to remixing. Has platform for kids to work on projects, some kids still get upset at other kids "stealing" their work when they remix it. Need to give technological and social support to remixing.

Sangita got some of us (including me) up and doing some bollywood dance. Now I feel all fired up! Evolution of Bollywood has complications of identity and authenticity? I actually missed it but would love to learn more, anyone have reading suggestions?


Note to self: check out the NML mapping guide.

henry: upset about "learning 2.0" because web 2.0 is a *business* model, been making fun of people tracing web history over 20 years and ignoring everything else, toy printing presses as web -10.0, people exchanged ideas, similar to web, men and women fought over women's rights, by 1870s african americans started expressing their voices.

karen: had to change how she thought about web 2.0 for her certification exam to be able to pass it, people talk about cms spoiling you for the rest of the world, but it also spoils you for other academic situations, not the same discourse.

Beth Coleman asks about participation and community and changing behaviors, some of it is wonderful.

Pilar says in Education, we really need to talk about who has the power, this is about democracy and citizenship, and technology is changes things, in some ways its making things more democractic, in other ways less. technology is empowering your mind.

Mitch thinks about de/centralization, new tech can be used for both, insidously things that seem decentralized arer actually just getting people to spread a centralized idea, need to have technology support and amplify individual and diverse voices. each new generation of technology this issue comes up again, need to rethink and refight these issues over and over again.

Henry: tea party involves a lot of what we talk about actively doesn't have a leader, people resist there being a leader, involves practices of remix. We've ignored conservative voices. now the tea party is a reactionary resistance movement and one of the most promiment things in the country and we CMS people don't understand them, we don't need to agree with them, but they are an embodiment of bottoms up grass roots energy whether we like it or not.

ricardo pitts-wiley's mobey dick remix was similar to fanfiction in how it takes the literary work and reimagines characters int he 21st century, makes whaling trade into drug trade.

Final Panel: International Media Flows: Global Media and Culture, moderated by Ian Condry
Panelists: Aswin Punathambekar, Xiaochang Li, Ana Domb, Orit Kuritsky, Jing Wang

Aswin: Media Futures are being worked out all over the world, not just in LA and London. Need to understand in their own terms, local context, before you can really be comparative.

Xiaochang (who is a mercenary): Claims she took NyQuil instead of DayQ uil and may drift off. :-) Companies hire her when they have some questions about digital/media/something, and they hire her to do a quick and dirty job, and she's been pushing K-Pop all over, which doesn't surprise me at all, knowing Xiaochang. :-) What happens when communities of sentiment are full of people selecting and curating and subtitling and discoursing over and remixing the very source that brought them together. (paraphrasing a lot here, reminder!) cms takes you away from the idea that you have to prove your mastery over something before making an offering. you don't have to be fluent in korean to do _something_ with k-pop, and someone else can come pick it up with their resources, have it be very iterative.

Jing Wang: Wishes CMS happy birthday with a cute animation. Working on NGO 2.0, civic media project with a Chinese face, karmic connection to cms, 2 years ago a professor from China was brought in as a visiting scholar (flew in from China for today's event!) Many NGOs in China are using digital resources, but they don't know much about social media. Trying to introduce web 2.0 culture to NGOs so they can find each other and collaborate and brand and market themselves. non-profits are change agents, trying to help them push their creativity and social innovation to the next level. They do 4 day long training workshops twice a year, they hope they will take these skills home and spread them. The boundary between civic social media and entertainment social media is basically not there. If she has any suggestion, she would like to see a stronger CMS identity with civic media, and more intersection with the nonprofit sector. This project would not have happened if she hadn't been at MIT. Her tangential relationship with CMS has had a big effect on how she thinks and how she conceptualizes this project.

Orit: Script writer and content creator from Israel. Used time at MIT to explore the exotic of the US. Just handed in script treatment for Israeli tv while living in Somerville, MA. Media production has become very international, animation for a title sequence done across the world from the rest of the show.

wants to share two contradictory experiences. was involved with revamping/relaunching the parenting channel. Was watching show about potty training, little vignettes about how it has been done in different places in the past, woman from a kibbutz talking about how it was done in a socialist manner, all the kids in the same age group at once. Pediatrician gives advice, same advice you'd get in new zealand or england, stood out from other lifestyle channels which were mostly from the bbc and discovery and such, so most families and experts you see are american british and australian, and a lingua franca on parenting emerges for Israelis, things like terrible twos and timeouts have become fundamental part of the Israeli family experience.

first season of Israeli version of "Big Brother". It comes with a huge manual, the Dutch control how each version goes. Everyone was divided up between two contestants on the show, one eastern european jew, one north african jew, super fierce division. People watched and debated as cultural face of Israel. Was in a restaurant during semi-finals, place was empty. everyone was crowded around TVs. Is it a debate over ethnic camps? No, the camps consisted of people of different origins, many israelis are mixed between north african and eastern europe, there was an arab israeli woman in the friedman camp, format that's been run all around the world with strict rules, and out of it we get a meaningful discussion we couldn't get anywhere else in the world.

Ana: Before coming to CMS, worked with producers, knew what content producers were, was basically who she worked for, put on festivals and performances, came to CMS to continue thinking about them, and then came to CMS and discovered the audience, and found herself coding youtube videos and trying to find what it meant to be a content producer these days. Was working in C3, got really lucky they got Brazilian partners and had to go to Carinval. :-) Found group of people from North Brazil who decided to forgo copyright cause they weren't making any money anyway. Techno Braga? (I can't guess at the spelling) They have giant parties. City of 5 million people and _three thousand_ parties a month? parties with 10k people every weekend, audience decided to be involved by forming teams, not quite fanclubs, not quite associated with the DJs. One example uses art from US justice league, called themselves "super amigos". ask them what you need to form a team "honesty, friendship, sense of adventure!" but the material object they would always have would be a bucket. the DJs can identify them "oh, super amigos are in the house" also to haul the beer around. We now _do_ media, it's not necessarily something we just consume. Upset about what was said about understanding media in its own terms, because it creates anxiety, not sure if she did or didn't or attempted to in this case. this is about globalization in the sense that they have inserted themselves in the world from a very empowered position and approrpiate content the way they want, but it's very local to north of brazil.

Ian Condry wants a keytar spewing flames.

Aswin: Get away from idea of "first here, then elsewhere", things are unfolding at the same time in different places, don't impose established timelines with all that baggage.

Jing: trying to get out of the frame of the global, think of practice not in discursive terms. To be frank about being on this panel, found out it was going to be an international theme, everyone can sit at that panel, us/uk media studies have come a long way with the so-called "international perspective", the rest of the world as you might call it, but thematizing the panel as international forced each panelist to work even harder. Being thematized makes it harder to draw in the mainstream. Thinks she could have been in the participatory panel and made the same presentation.

Orit: Never thought she'd do this, but refers the questioner to the third chapter of her thesis (re the original question about time that i totally failed to write down).

Xiaochang picks up on Jing, and being grouped as the outside group, the 5 people not born in the US, feels there may be some ghettoization with international stuff, every other panel was also global,

Ana: we're always aware of this with foe, don't want to have "international panel"

xiochang: what do we have instead, tokens on each panel?

william urrichio: these panels are based around what our ideas were of what we wanted to do 10 years ago, and the one glaring absence is the international. The point is not the "foreign" as in foreign languages, the international does permeate all we do

Ian: if we'd all been farmed out to different panels, we wouldn't be able to have this conversation.

Ian's worked on hip-hop going us-> global and anime going japan -> global, Hip hop was seen as stealing and not really music, anime was seen as for kids, neither pushed by big things, but have gone global none the less.

Jing: somehow we always come back to industry, i want to see us talk about games and non-profits, things like the berkman's center's free rice, want to draw us towards the non-profit sector, it's exciting and amusing

Ana: there are certain forms of fandom that just by participating they are inacting citizenship, that's important to remember, don't force our ideas on to them, a group gained a voiced through this music engagement.

Orit: with people in differnet parts of the world making media for other parts, new questions and issues about labor. Israeli tv show translated verbatim to english language version, israeli script writer doesn't see a dime.